The effects of the penalty clauses applicable to the early termination of lease agreements for comercial prenises. Analysis of the Supreme Court judgment of April 3rd, 2018
Keywords:
Urban lease agreements, Early termination, Commercial premises, Breach of contract, Penalty clause, Rationality of the penalty, Conditions to moderate the penalty are not met, Inexistence of unjust enrichment, rebus sic stantibus clause, Shopping CentersAbstract
The Supreme Court’s judgment of April 3rd, 2018, has upheld the claim of the lessor of a comercial lease agreement, condemning the lessee, who had unduly early-terminated the lease, to pay entirely the penalty agreed for this breach of contract. This judgment dismisses arguments seeking the reduction of the penalty which had been upheld by the dominant previous case law. The analysis made by the Supreme Court in this case, confirming the full effect of the penalty, might be invoked by lessors in numerous cases in the future, for the penalty clause which has been analysed is typical in comercial lease agreements. This paper examines the keys of this case law and why the lessor’s position in these disputes is stronger after this judgment.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-02-28
Issue
Section
ESTUDIOS JURISPRUDENCIALES: DERECHO CIVIL. OBLIGACIONES Y CONTRATOS (2013-2021)
How to Cite
The effects of the penalty clauses applicable to the early termination of lease agreements for comercial prenises. Analysis of the Supreme Court judgment of April 3rd, 2018. (2019). Critical Review of Real Estate Law, 771, 445 a 455. https://revistacritica.es/rcdi/article/view/1055