EL DERECHO DE PRENDA NO SÓLO SE CARACTERIZA POR UNA FACULTAD DE RETENCIÓN SINO TAMBIÉN POR LA FACULTAD DE ENAJENAR LAS COSAS CONSTITUIDAS EN GARANTÍA.

Authors

  • MORATILLA GALÁN, ISABEL

Keywords:

THE PLEDGE

Abstract

In this study we see that the pledging of money is not legally possible if the money is mixed into the creditor's body of assets, but the pledging of credit held against the return of a «tantundem» is legally possible. In addition, if the borrower is in turn the secured creditor of the first creditor and the credit held against return is what secures his credit, offsetting is a possibility, and the offsetting agreement will not be prohibited under article 1859 of the Civil Code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2007-02-28

Issue

Section

ANÁLISIS CRÍTICO DE JURISPRUDENCIA. DERECHO CIVIL. OBLIGACIONES Y CONTRATOS (2005-2012)

How to Cite

EL DERECHO DE PRENDA NO SÓLO SE CARACTERIZA POR UNA FACULTAD DE RETENCIÓN SINO TAMBIÉN POR LA FACULTAD DE ENAJENAR LAS COSAS CONSTITUIDAS EN GARANTÍA. (2007). Critical Review of Real Estate Law, 699, 323 a 331. https://revistacritica.es/rcdi/article/view/2780