EL DERECHO DE PRENDA NO SÓLO SE CARACTERIZA POR UNA FACULTAD DE RETENCIÓN SINO TAMBIÉN POR LA FACULTAD DE ENAJENAR LAS COSAS CONSTITUIDAS EN GARANTÍA.
Keywords:
THE PLEDGEAbstract
In this study we see that the pledging of money is not legally possible if the money is mixed into the creditor's body of assets, but the pledging of credit held against the return of a «tantundem» is legally possible. In addition, if the borrower is in turn the secured creditor of the first creditor and the credit held against return is what secures his credit, offsetting is a possibility, and the offsetting agreement will not be prohibited under article 1859 of the Civil Code.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2007-02-28
Issue
Section
ANÁLISIS CRÍTICO DE JURISPRUDENCIA. DERECHO CIVIL. OBLIGACIONES Y CONTRATOS (2005-2012)
How to Cite
EL DERECHO DE PRENDA NO SÓLO SE CARACTERIZA POR UNA FACULTAD DE RETENCIÓN SINO TAMBIÉN POR LA FACULTAD DE ENAJENAR LAS COSAS CONSTITUIDAS EN GARANTÍA. (2007). Critical Review of Real Estate Law, 699, 323 a 331. https://revistacritica.es/rcdi/article/view/2780