IMPROCEDENCIA DE LA REPERCUSIÓN DE OBRAS NECESARIAS EN EL ARRENDATARIO DE LOCAL DE NEGOCIO CUANDO SE TRATE DE CONTRATOS CELEBRADOS A PARTIR DE LA ENTRADA EN VIGOR DE LA LAU DE 1964: ANÁLISIS DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TS DE 21 DE MAYO DE 2009.

Abstract

In this paper we have analysed the existence of a business lease made after the Urban Lease Act of 1964 took force. The analysis is conducted on the basis of the jurisprudential criteria set in the Supreme Court ruling of 21 May 2009, which considers that in such cases section 108 of the ULA concerning charging the tenant for the costs of necessary improvements is not applicable, whereas at the present time the parties are free to establish rent levels and rent updating systems.