Comentario del recorrido jurisprudencial del caso Orcel: daño emergente y lucro cesante en la indemnización de daños contractuales: Obligaciones y contratos

Julio Esplugues García

Commentary on the judicial path of the Orcel case: consequential damages and loss of profits in the compensation of contractual damages

Obligaciones y contratos

Authors

Julio Esplugues García Doctorando en Derecho Civil Universidades de Bolonia y Valencia Becario del Real Colegio de España en Bolonia

Keywords:

Breach of contract, Damages, Damnus emergens, Lucrum cessans, Duty of mitigation

Abstract

The compensation of pecuniary damages after breach of contract has always opposed the categories of damnus emergens and lucrum cessans, so that each loss had to be included in one of these categories in order to be compensated. This article briefly analyzes whether this is necessary, using a case of great media relevance.

Downloads

BUY: Requires Subscription or Fee Comentario del recorrido jurisprudencial del caso Orcel: daño emergente y lucro cesante en la indemnización de daños contractuales (Spanish) (EUR 5)

This action will take you to the payment gateway to purchase the article.

Published

2024-03-25

Issue

No. 801 (2024): Enero-febrero

Section

JURISPRUDENTIAL STUDIES

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Commentary on the judicial path of the Orcel case: consequential damages and loss of profits in the compensation of contractual damages: Obligaciones y contratos. (2024). Critical Review of Real Estate Law, 801, 477-504. https://revistacritica.es/rcdi/article/view/339

Download Citation