Commentary on the judicial path of the Orcel case: consequential damages and loss of profits in the compensation of contractual damages
Obligaciones y contratos
Keywords:
Breach of contract, Damages, Damnus emergens, Lucrum cessans, Duty of mitigationAbstract
The compensation of pecuniary damages after breach of contract has always opposed the categories of damnus emergens and lucrum cessans, so that each loss had to be included in one of these categories in order to be compensated. This article briefly analyzes whether this is necessary, using a case of great media relevance.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-03-25
Issue
Section
JURISPRUDENTIAL STUDIES
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Critical Review of Real Estate Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Commentary on the judicial path of the Orcel case: consequential damages and loss of profits in the compensation of contractual damages: Obligaciones y contratos. (2024). Critical Review of Real Estate Law, 801, 477-504. https://revistacritica.es/rcdi/article/view/339