LA IMPUGNACIÓN DE LA DETERMINACIÓN DEL PRECIO POR UN TERCERO EN LOS CONTRATOS DE COMPRAVENTA DE ACCIONES Y LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 1 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 2006.

Abstract

The Supreme Court's ruling of 1 September 2006 restrictively finds that the arbitrator's decision can be challenged when there are defects of consent, or when the instructions of the principles have not been followed and unfairness has resulted, valuing the tie between the parties and the auditors' reports, according to the criteria inherent in the auditors' function, because the share purchase contract at issue has so stipulated.